Michael Glick @glickmike

Joined February 2010

Tweets

335
Followers

127
Following

462
Likes

900

Nolan @NationWideNolan

3 years ago

Ah yes let’s let these two teams bludgeon each other all game and call that

1 4 19 3K 0

Josh Riley @JoshRileyUE

4 years ago

There are 1,702 structurally deficient bridges in New York State. But my GOP opponent @claudiatenney voted against funding for good jobs to fix them. She was wrong. RT if you agree.

1 28 45 0 0

Chris Hayes @chrislhayes

4 years ago

Wow. Phenomenal news. One of the most impressive lawyers I’ve ever met.

Mike Sacks @MikeSacksEsq

4 years ago

Wow. Phenomenal news. One of the most impressive lawyers I’ve ever met.

14 289 2K 0 13

Download Image

21 314 3K 0 17

Proud of my good friend and former co-counsel ⁦@dale_e_ho⁩ for his nomination to the bench (SDNY). Dale is among the nation’s leaders on voting rights — and is just an all-around good guy. An inspired choice by the President! whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

0 0 0 0 0

Georgetown Hoops @GeorgetownHoops

5 years ago

THIS IS OUR HOUSE chants starting at the Garden - for the few who could be here and all the fans who are watching from all over - THANK YOU! THIS. IS. OUR. HOUSE.

26 252 2K 0 3

Ronald Klain @RonaldKlain

5 years ago

Hoya Saxa! Georgetown crushing in hoops under the Biden Harris administration.

51 190 2K 0 5

Dan Pfeiffer @danpfeiffer

5 years ago

@CasualHoya This is excruciating

1 1 44 0 0

Steve Schale @steveschale

5 years ago

Right person for this moment. Thank you ⁦@JoeBiden⁩

3 14 134 0 1

Download Image

Zoe Tillman @ZoeTillman

5 years ago

New: A deep dive into tonight's opinion demolishing the Trump campaign's bid to stop Pennsylvania from certifying Biden as the winner — and illustrating how the campaign has failed to translate unfounded fraud conspiracy theories into winning legal claims buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…

107 409 2K 0 36

Neal Katyal @neal_katyal

5 years ago

This excerpt from the Court’s opinion tonight, slamming Trump and Giuliani, is all you need to know. Mind you,this is a conservative Judge who was a former GOP official. This is what the rule of law is at its heart—not about the identity of the parties but rules that apply to all

follow @ryanjreilly on bluesky, signal in bio @ryanjreilly

5 years ago

63 681 3K 0 84

Download Image

104 934 5K 0 43

Chris Murphy 🟧 @ChrisMurphyCT

5 years ago

“This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments w/o merit and speculative accusations...unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its 6th most populated state.”

43 365 3K 0 7

Philip Rucker @PhilipRucker

5 years ago

A remarkable opinion from a federal judge in Pennsylvania dismissing Trump’s lawsuit. The introduction alone is a scathing condemnation of a sitting president’s quest to disenfranchise millions of voters. washingtonpost.com/politics/us-ju…

26 133 764 0 5

Jake Tapper 🦅 @jaketapper

5 years ago

PA Judge Brann is not having it, writing the Trump campaign lawyers "ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters.... One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and...

523 3K 28K 0 194

Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney

5 years ago

The ruling is just a wholesale evisceration of the Trump legal team's argument and even their competence. He indicates that they misunderstood basic legal tenets and are seeking remedies — like tossing hundreds of thousands of votes — that don't remotely match the complaint.

24 201 709 0 9

Download Image

Rick Hasen @rickhasen

5 years ago

From the judge on the merits: "Plaintiffs’ only remaining claim alleges a violation of equal protection. This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together from two distinct theories in an attempt to avoid controlling precedent."

11 167 1K 0 11

Jen 'now @jenrubin9' Rubin @JRubinBlogger

5 years ago

PA decision: "Plaintiffs seek to remedy denial of their votes by invalidating the votes of millions of others. Rather than requesting that their votes be counted, they seek to discredit scores of other votes, but only for one race. This is simply not how the Constitution works"