Your coding agent didn’t fail.
It guessed.
Same ticket. Same agent.
20 real runs.
Without Stride:❌ 0/10 right on the first try
With Stride:✅ 10/10 right on the first try
⚡ 32% fewer tokens
🧩 Fewer tools
👨💻 Fewer engineer hours
Because shipping software shouldn’t mean throwing more tools, tokens, and engineering time at the problem.
Less guessing. Less overhead. More shipping.
Comment “Stride” and we’ll send you a discount coupon straight to your inbox.
Whatever comes next, take it in Stride.
#AI#SoftwareEngineering#DevTools#AIAgents
Breaking up with seven tools is hard. Moving in with one is easy. It even brings your backlog.
Get Stride at 50% off with code STRIDEVIP. Limited time only.
stride.page
We put your whole tool stack in one meeting room. It went exactly how you'd expect.
Get Stride at 50% off with code STRIDEVIP, for a limited time.
stride.page
Your AI agent isn't lost. It's guessing. And the meter's running 🚕
Stride hands it the full context. Plans are 50% off with code STRIDEVIP for a limited time.
stride.page
The most expensive sentence in AI coding:
"That's not what I meant."
Every time someone types it, the team pays for another lap.
The ticket says "Add a wishlist." The AI fills the gaps with guesses. Review finds the wrong things got built. Someone explains it all over again. The AI rebuilds. Round it goes.
Engineer hours, every lap. Tokens, every lap.
A smarter model won't fix this. It'll just guess faster.
A ticket is a title and a checklist. Everything else your team already worked out (the decisions, the designs, the tests, the bugs you've hit before) lives somewhere the agent can't see. So it guesses.
Give the same AI the same task with the whole brief, and the loop becomes a line. It builds to the decisions already made. Review confirms. Done.
Paid once.
That's what we built Stride to do. Every task carries its full context, and the agent you already use (Claude Code, Cursor or Codex) gets all of it in one call. Link in the first comment.
How many laps does a feature usually take on your team?
The real productivity hack isn't another 5 AM routine.
It’s not another productivity app.
And it’s definitely not another meeting.
It’s knowing:
→ What needs to happen
→ Who’s responsible
→ What’s blocked
→ What’s next
When everyone has visibility, work moves differently.
That’s Stride.
Less confusion.
Less chasing.
More momentum.
#Stride#Productivity#ProjectManagement#Teamwork#WorkSmarter#Collaboration
Years of automating banks. AI agents, RPA, Appian, Mendix. And the biggest lesson had nothing to do with any single system.
The work is never stuck in the tools. It is stuck in the gaps between them. That is the problem Stride exists to close.
#FounderNote#Automation#Banking#SoftwareDelivery
A prompt window holds a snippet. Your project holds the whole web: stories, tests, architecture, defects.
Guess which one the AI should be reading.
Ground it in the project, not the paragraph. Context is the model, not the prompt.
#AInative#DevTools#ContextEngineering#ProductDevelopment#SoftwareDelivery
@AKirtesh The “one main weapon” approach makes sense. Tool-hopping feels productive, but sticking with one tool long enough to build a real workflow is where the gains actually show up.
@Scobleizer@phanindra_ai The shift from “AI that answers” to “AI that acts” is probably the biggest change happening right now. The real challenge will be knowing when to let it act autonomously. 👀
@mardehaym The workflow question is underrated. A company can have the best AI tools in the world, but if the underlying processes aren't ready, adoption will struggle.
@mdshefat217@sibylcap Exactly. Reasoning without memory is like starting a new conversation every time. Context is what makes an agent actually useful.
@Taniyatweets_ AI agents. But honestly, I’m becoming more obsessed with what happens around the agent — context, collaboration, testing, and getting from “idea” to shipped product.
A 30-second check before any story goes to the AI, or to a teammate.
One behavior per criterion. A named trigger and outcome. A result you can point at. A failure path in writing.
Criteria like this become tests. Vague ones become meetings.
Stride's Plan module drafts acceptance criteria grounded in your project, and Verify turns them into test cases on the same graph. But the checklist works on a whiteboard too.
#AcceptanceCriteria#Agile#QualityEngineering#ProductManagement
2 Followers 555 Followinghola mi nombre es Alexander
tengo 17 años
soy un guitarrista principalmente
mis bandas favoritas son Arctic Monkys y the neighborhood
me gusta mucho patinar
1.3M Followers 2K FollowingPremier site for classical chart analysis of futures markets. Trader for five decades. Market Wizard. Author.
Membership Factor Report https://t.co/83DcDyF2SE
2.0M Followers 179 FollowingNobel Laureate. Co-Founder & Chair @GoogleDeepMind; Chief Scientist of Alphabet. Founder & CEO @IsomorphicLabs. Building the future...
5.3M Followers 291 FollowingStarted & runs 37signals (makers of Basecamp, HEY, and ONCE). Non-serial entrepreneur, serial author. DM or email me at [email protected].
4.9M Followers 545 FollowingChairman and CEO of @IBM, avid learner and listener, relentlessly focused on what's next, #GoodTechIBM, father, husband, @Illinois_Alma, @IITKanpur
6.0M Followers 126 Following@GM Chair and CEO leading an outstanding team with the ambition, talent and technology to create a world with zero crashes, zero emissions and zero congestion.
5.0M Followers 159 FollowingValues are most enduring thing leaders create. Engineering pioneer, proud grandfather, philanthropist, Christian, farm boy at heart.
10.3M Followers 627 FollowingSix thousand years ago, someone invented the plow, and we all got wealthier. A gentle reminder that all civilizational wealth is driven by invention.
4.6M Followers 2K FollowingFounder and CEO, O'Reilly Media. Watching the alpha geeks, sharing their stories, helping the future unfold. Didn't pay for a blue check, cannot make it go away